Bug#639798: No solution for i386 architecture?
Will this automatically work now, that Webkit 1.6.1 is coming in Sid. Or does this need need to be supported in Epiphany before magically working? //Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#639798: No solution for i386 architecture?
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 09:59 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote: Will this automatically work now, that Webkit 1.6.1 is coming in Sid. Or does this need need to be supported in Epiphany before magically working? Unfortunately no. As long as webkit links to gtk3 and flash to gtk2 this is not going to work without nspluginwrapper. With a webkit2-based epiphany this will work again since the plugin process is linked with gtk2, but webkit2 is still under development. Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org Debian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#639798: No solution for i386 architecture?
nspluginwrapper is for AMD64 only. Do we wait for Flash to become compatible to GTK+ 3? Is that more likely to happen than iceweasel going to GTK+ 3? Please forgive my ignorance in this arena, I am completely flummoxed by GTK+.
Bug#639798: No solution for i386 architecture?
Le lundi 05 septembre 2011 à 11:09 -0400, Dominique Brazziel a écrit : Do we wait for Flash to become compatible to GTK+ 3? Is that more likely to happen than iceweasel going to GTK+ 3? No. Please forgive my ignorance in this arena, I am completely flummoxed by GTK+. This is not a GTK+ problem, but a weakness in the NSplugin architecture. This will be fixed by webkit 1.6, and until that the only available workaround is nspluginwrapper. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
