Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
2011/9/12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com: On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió: [snip] Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview should be filled

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-13 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mar 13 Sep 2011 04:06:12 Mathieu Malaterre escribió: [snip] Just FYI. *.cmake files have been moved to paraview-dev, if you take the latest from git. What is left to do is: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/paraview.git;a=

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-12 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió: [snip] Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview should be filled a normal bug, raised to important in ~3 or 4 weeks and then to

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-11 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Lisandro, 2011/9/11 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com: On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió: I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview. That sounds like a very bad

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-10 Thread Anton Gladky
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#640195: Remove paraview-dev

2011-09-10 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió: I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview. That sounds like a very bad decision. Header files should be provided by the -dev package. This allows a