Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sam, On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote: When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via systemctl rather than directly) in a way that breaks the if-up.d script. I've

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 11:01 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Sam, On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote: When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via systemctl rather than

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-12 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 19:56 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: AIUI, the if-up.d script is really just a bandage that deals with the case where nmbd exits because, when it's launched, there are no network interfaces that are up. Come to think of it... how does the samba package on Ubuntu handle this? Is

Bug#640668: samba: Updated if-up.d script to function under systemd

2011-09-06 Thread Sam Morris
Package: samba Version: 2:3.6.0-1 Severity: normal When systemd is installed, the behaviour of '/etc/init.d/samba status' changes (systemd changes the LSB init functions to launch services via systemctl rather than directly) in a way that breaks the if-up.d script. I've modified the script to