On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 11:26 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
no reason, should be applied.
I'll commit it in the weekend.
If you don't want to just delete
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
no reason, should be applied.
I'll commit it in the weekend.
If you don't want to just delete vpnc-script from the vpnc repo, then it
would be best to pull in *all* the fixes from the git tree rather than
diverging.
In fact, if you want
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
no reason, should be applied.
I'll commit it in the weekend.
If you don't want to just delete vpnc-script from the vpnc repo, then it
would be best to pull in
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Florian Schlichting
fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
David, Antonio, Eric:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In the fix you provide,
1) you add ;s/ipid 0x//g at
David, Antonio, Eric:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In the fix you provide,
1) you add ;s/ipid 0x//g at the end of string.
This does not impact backward compatibility. I'm in favour to
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:34:40PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
Note: That fuzz you speak of when applying the patch... that's due to
the rest of the fixes to vpnc-script since it was imported into its own
git repo, surely?
yes, the line numbers don't match - there are another 23 lines in the
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:29 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
I was just thinking that I should submit a patch which removes the
out-of-date script from vpnc altogether. There have been a number of
other fixes in the git tree too.
What do you mean remove the script from vpnc - how would
(Resending to Debian bug since I just got a bizarre complaint that my
reply didn't have a Package: line at the start. Perhaps it didn't like
the original mail being S/MIME signed?)
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In the fix you provide,
1) you add ;s/ipid 0x//g at
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
In the fix you provide,
1) you add ;s/ipid 0x//g at the end of string.
This does not impact backward compatibility. I'm in favour to
commit it.
It's not sufficient. We originally had this in the vpnc-scripts.git
repository¹
9 matches
Mail list logo
