Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17:19PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: The patch is below. Hi, I haven't heard back yet, on this bug. I'm *really* hoping that the fix can be included in the next Debian update. Is there anything I can do to help this process? Thanks! - Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-29 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2011-09-29 at 19:19 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17:19PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: The patch is below. Hi, I haven't heard back yet, on this bug. I'm *really* hoping that the fix can be included in the next Debian update. I guess it won't. I was [VAC]

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-22 Thread Chris Frey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: It might be worth identifiying when the bug was closed upstream and see if it's possible to backport that fix to stable. Not something I'll be able to do soon though, but if you manage to identify a relevant patch, that would

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2011-09-17 at 04:42 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: Does this mean it is closed in Squeeze as well? I was hoping for a fix in Squeeze (or at least keep it open). I'm not sure what the tag means, and I don't see it via the web anymore. Closing means the bug is fixed. Versioning indicates in

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-17 Thread Chris Frey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:10:23AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: version: 3.0.3-1 tag 641898 squeeze thanks On sam., 2011-09-17 at 03:03 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: I tested my own code on Debian Sid, with version 3.0.3, and it worked, so it seems Squeeze-specific. Ok so closing with