Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> "Steffen Möller" writes:
>> Formally speaking there is nothing to argue about. We should remove that
>> .jar.
>> To grant us some more time to orchestrate the individuals behind that
>> package and get up to speed with the much progressed upstream
>> developments, may
"Steffen Möller" writes:
>> Andreas Tille writes:
>> > You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
>> > be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
>> > to obtain the source code).
>>
>> "The general rule is, if you distribute binaries, you
Le Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> This seems to be fixed in the packaging repo. What is left to do
> before the updated package is uploaded? Would you be terribly
> offended if I requested removal of the current package in the
> meantime, so we could continu
3 matches
Mail list logo
