Hey,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
field. Both packages offer a drmaa implementation.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have them as
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Michael Hanke m...@debian.org wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
field. Both packages offer
On Nov 10, 2011 3:57 PM, Dominique Belhachemi domi...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Michael Hanke m...@debian.org wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
Instead
Package: drmaa
Version: 0.4~b3
Please remove libdrmaa1.0 from the Depends field.
Instead libdrmaa1.0 and pbs-drmaa1 could be mentioned in the Suggests
field. Both packages offer a drmaa implementation.
Thanks
Dominique
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
4 matches
Mail list logo