Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 649503 important thanks As parts of GNOME 3.2 are depending on pyatspi 3.2, it is important to get such an updated package into unstable. If you need help, please shout. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from

Bug#649503: Fw: Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
- Message Transféré - Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:23:04 -0600 De: Kenny Hitt hittsj...@gmail.com À: Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org Sujet: Re: Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable Hi. On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:44:24AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote

Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-23 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:45:30 -0600, Kenny Hitt hittsj...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi. Actually python-pyatspi and python-pyatspi2 provide the same interface on one side, but interface to different and not conpatibal releases of at-spi. Eventually, python-pyatspi2 and at-spi2 will become the

Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-22 Thread Kenny Hitt
Hi. Actually python-pyatspi and python-pyatspi2 provide the same interface on one side, but interface to different and not conpatibal releases of at-spi. Eventually, python-pyatspi2 and at-spi2 will become the default, but at-spi2 still has bugs not found in at-spi. Kenny On Mon,

Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Source: pyatspi Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, Could you please package the last version and upload it to unstable. pyatspi is required by caribou which is required by gnome-shell 3.2 Thanks Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-21 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
I don't know if pyatspi is the same thing as at-spi, but if yes I believe it's packaged in experimental. But numerous bugs are in it, that's why it wasn't packaged in sid. Hope it can help. Jean-Philippe MENGUAL Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 17:49 +0100, Laurent Bigonville a écrit : Source:

Bug#649503: Please package last version and upload it to unstable

2011-11-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, Well actually there is python-pyatspi (built from at-spi) and python-pyatspi2 (built from pyatspi) that conflict with each other. I think that both are using the same API, so the package built from at-spi could be dropped and python-pyatspi2 could be renamed to python-pyatspi. That of