I am in favour of the list.
I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not publically
archived. It may be that group will become comfortable with having the
archive visibility delayed by a month or more, such that all
conversations do come out, or perhaps not. I think that
Hallo! Du (Michael Richardson) hast geschrieben:
I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not publically
archived. It may be that group will become comfortable with having the
archive visibility delayed by a month or more, such that all
conversations do come out, or perhaps
Cord == Cord Beermann c...@debian.org writes:
I believe that it is useful for the list to be initially not
publically archived. It may be that group will become
comfortable with having the archive visibility delayed by a month
or more, such that all conversations do come
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Michael Richardson wrote:
The point is not to make it not-archived, the point is to delay the
archive while the group figures out what's it's policy is. If some
participants archive it and post it, oh well. It's not like it's
wikileaks.
First, if anyone is going to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
