Bug#650129: dh_install --list-missing not working ?

2014-03-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Control: severity -1 important

Hum, I have been starring at this comment for a while. It seems that
the current package avogadro take advantage of this trick:

$ apt-get source avogadro=1.0.3-10.1
$ cd avogadro-1.0.3/
$ cat debian/rules
[...]
override_dh_install:
dh_install --list-missing

What I do not understand is that whenever I do not use
debian/*.install file explicitely but prefer something like:

override_dh_install:
dh_install -pfoobar-tools usr/bin/exe
dh_install --list-missing

list-missing believe that usr/bin/exe exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere.

Would it be possible to update --list-missing to be able to have
explicit dh_install rules instead of debian/*.install files ?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#650129:

2014-03-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
See:
https://github.com/malaterre/hello

Steps:

$ git clone g...@github.com:malaterre/hello.git
$ cd hello/
$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
[...]
dh_install -plibfoo0 usr/lib/libfoo.so.*
dh_install -plibfoo-dev usr/lib/libfoo.so
dh_install --list-missing
dh_install: usr/lib/libfoo.so.0 exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere
dh_install: usr/lib/libfoo.so.1.0 exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere
dh_install: usr/lib/libfoo.so exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#650129: Make --list-missing switch of dh_install the default for multiple-binary source packages

2011-11-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Package: debhelper
Version: 8.9.11
Severity: wishlist

If debhelper installs (dh_auto_install) things into debian/tmp it would
IMHO be an advantage if the --list-missing switch of dh_install becomes
default. I usually write an override target for such packages to enable
this behaviour. IMHO it would not hurt to be deafult behaviour.

What is your opinion here?

Regards, Daniel


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (560, 'stable'), (110, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages debhelper depends on:
ii  binutils2.22-1 
ii  dpkg-dev1.16.1.2   
ii  file5.09-2 
ii  html2text   1.3.2a-15  
ii  man-db  2.6.0.2-3  
ii  perl5.14.2-5   
ii  po-debconf  1.0.16+nmu1

debhelper recommends no packages.

Versions of packages debhelper suggests:
ii  dh-make  0.59

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org