Bug#656371: /usr/bin/bts: 'bts affects 999999 foo' replaces existing affects setting

2012-01-18 Thread James McCoy
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:04:02PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > while bts tag/usertag default to add ('+') new tags, affects replaces > the current set of packages with the package(s) in the argument. > This behavior is nonintuitive to me. Agreed, but that's the default behavior of debbugs, wh

Bug#656371: /usr/bin/bts: 'bts affects 999999 foo' replaces existing affects setting

2012-01-18 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: devscripts Version: 2.11.2 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/bts Hi, while bts tag/usertag default to add ('+') new tags, affects replaces the current set of packages with the package(s) in the argument. This behavior is nonintuitive to me. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-