tags 658981 + confirmed
quit
On 2012-02-08 19:26, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > | cupt::resolver::not-autoremove-if-rdepends-exist '.*'
>
> From a grammatical perspective, that should probably be "no" instead of
> "not".
True, thank
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2012-02-08 06:19, James McCoy wrote:
> > I have four xserver-xorg-video-* packages installed: fbdev, nouveau,
> > intel, and vesa. Only fbdev is marked as automatically installed, yet
> > cupt is still trying to remove that
retitle 658981 cupt: implement 'not-autoremove-if-rdepends-exist' package list
option
severity 658981 wishlist
quit
On 2012-02-08 06:19, James McCoy wrote:
> I have four xserver-xorg-video-* packages installed: fbdev, nouveau,
> intel, and vesa. Only fbdev is marked as automatically installed, y
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2012-02-06 22:01, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > I don't see a bug here. You only need one video DDX package to satisfy
> > > the dependency by xserver-xorg, so
On 2012-02-07 03:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
[...]
> > 2) Further discussion. For example, more arguments why new behavior may
> > be unnacceptable as a default, or implementing more fine-grained setup
> > to specify user-level dependencies like
> >
> > cupt::resolver::u
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> I see three ways to "resolve" this bug:
>
> 0) Reaffirm that unmarkauto command should be used whenever
> user wants to say "this was automatically installed initially, but now I
> want to keep it". Close the bug as not a bug.
>
> 1) Agree that some users want less agg
Hi James and Jonathan,
[ Jonathan, I don't know do you want explicit CCs or not, kept it for
now ]
On 2012-02-06 22:01, James McCoy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as
> > > "to be re
severity 658981 normal
thanks
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 08:37:47PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as
> > "to be removed". As far as I can tell, this is only happening when
> > those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship.
>
Hi James,
James McCoy wrote:
> Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as
> "to be removed". As far as I can tell, this is only happening when
> those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship.
[...]
> The following packages will be removed:
>
> [...] xserver-xorg-v
Package: cupt
Version: 2.4.0
Severity: important
Since upgrading to 2.4.0, various packages are suddenly showing up as
"to be removed". As far as I can tell, this is only happening when
those packages are satisfying an ORed relationship.
$ sudo cupt satisfy
Building the package cache...
Initiali
10 matches
Mail list logo
