Bug#659252: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#659252: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the icinga package
Christian PERRIER schrieb am Sunday, den 22. April 2012: Dear maintainer of icinga and Debian translators, Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the icinga Debian package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS. I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload for this package in order to fix this long-time pending localization bug as well as all other pending translations. The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in four days, so I will proceed with the NMU. (that's indeed surprising as nagios/icinga maintainers *are* active. Alexander?) sorry, too much private things. I will of course do the upload as usual :). But it has to wait a few days until my next tree is ready (see the RC bugs against postgres supprt of idoutils. I want to have these fixed first). But maybe I am ready when you are ready :). Thanks Alex pgp73y20kv7fh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659252: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#659252: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the icinga package
Quoting Alexander Wirt (formo...@formorer.de): sorry, too much private things. I will of course do the upload as usual :). But it has to wait a few days until my next tree is ready (see the RC bugs against postgres supprt of idoutils. I want to have these fixed first). But maybe I am ready when you are ready :). No problem. I wouldn't have NMU'ed without a few more warnings anyway as I know you're reactive to these l10n NMUs. So, I'll proceed the usual way for icingia : no NMU and leave things up to you. I also have a pending l10n NMU for nagios3. Should I do the same? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#659252: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#659252: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the icinga package
Christian PERRIER schrieb am Sunday, den 22. April 2012: Quoting Alexander Wirt (formo...@formorer.de): sorry, too much private things. I will of course do the upload as usual :). But it has to wait a few days until my next tree is ready (see the RC bugs against postgres supprt of idoutils. I want to have these fixed first). But maybe I am ready when you are ready :). No problem. I wouldn't have NMU'ed without a few more warnings anyway as I know you're reactive to these l10n NMUs. So, I'll proceed the usual way for icingia : no NMU and leave things up to you. I also have a pending l10n NMU for nagios3. Should I do the same? As usual, yes. Alex pgpl7CI2NlC2Y.pgp Description: PGP signature