Bug#659732: [autobuild] Please add broadcom-sta to non-free autobuild list

2012-03-15 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:20:55AM +0400, Cyril Lacoux wrote: Le samedi 25 février 2012 18:17:15, Philipp Kern a écrit : I really dislike the language of 2.3b, though: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/b/broadcom-sta/current/ copyright | 2.3. Restriction on

Bug#659732: [autobuild] Please add broadcom-sta to non-free autobuild list

2012-02-26 Thread Cyril Lacoux
Le samedi 25 février 2012 18:17:15, Philipp Kern a écrit : I really dislike the language of 2.3b, though: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/b/broadcom-sta/current/ copyright | 2.3. Restriction on Distribution. Licensee shall only distribute the | Software (a) under the

Bug#659732: [autobuild] Please add broadcom-sta to non-free autobuild list

2012-02-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:23:37PM +0400, Cyril Lacoux wrote: I checked the license and saw nothing that could forbid such thing. Moreover this is not really a compilation since the two concerned packages (broadcom-sta-source and broadcom-sta-dkms) provide the source tree of the driver.

Bug#659732: [autobuild] Please add broadcom-sta to non-free autobuild list

2012-02-20 Thread Cyril Lacoux
Hi, Broadcom-sta[1] is the proprietary driver for some wireless network cards from Broadcom. I recently switched package architecture from «all» to «amd64 i386» because the driver has a prorietary precompiled part which is only available for these two architectures. After last upload to