Package: xul-ext-requestpolicy Version: 0.5.24-1 Severity: normal Hello maintainers of xul-ext-requestpolicy package, thanks for maintaining this extension in Debian!
The current debian/copyright file of this package claims that all shipped files are under a license labelled as "MPL-1.1 or GPL-3". The description of this label, however, seems to correspond to a classical MPLv1.1/GPLv2/LGPLv2.1 tri-license. This seems to be inconsistent. Moreover, the final paragraph states: | On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public License Version 3 | can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3' file. | The full text of the MPL is in the same directory as this file with the | filename MPL and may be compressed. which seems to be inaccurate, since there's no MPL text in /usr/share/common-licenses/ $ ls /usr/share/common-licenses/ Apache-2.0 BSD GFDL-1.2 GPL GPL-2 LGPL LGPL-2.1 Artistic GFDL GFDL-1.3 GPL-1 GPL-3 LGPL-2 LGPL-3 A quick glance at the git repository http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mozext/requestpolicy.git;a=summary seems to reveal that some files are under the GPLv3 license, while other ones are under the MPLv1.1/GPLv2/LGPLv2.1 tri-license. Further special cases may exist: I haven't performed a full license audit on the package... Please fix the debian/copyright file, so that it reflects the actual copyright information and distribution licenses for the files included in the package. Thanks for your time! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org