On 2014-03-23 23:36:08 -0500, David Smith wrote:
Yes. In short, it appears that the upstream maintainer doesn't believe
that every software application ever made should go out of it's way to
present a configuration option to the user to change how that one
application presents date and time
Considering that the upstream maintainer have adamantly stated that he
will not implement the requested feature, should this bug be marked as
wontfix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2014-03-23 22:09:47 -0300, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
Considering that the upstream maintainer have adamantly stated that he will
not implement the requested feature, should this bug be marked as wontfix?
In my case, I stopped using Liferea since upstream didn't want to
make some basic features
tags 667973 wontfix
done.
On 03/23/2014 08:09 PM, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
Considering that the upstream maintainer have adamantly stated that he
will not implement the requested feature, should this bug be marked as
wontfix?
Yes. In short, it appears that the upstream maintainer doesn't
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2012-06-26 19:53:37 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 16.06.2012 21:17, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-16 20:38:52 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
The idea was to radically simplify the date formatting by relying
only
On 2012-06-27 12:49:48 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
strptime() does parsing, not formatting. strftime() does formatting,
and you should use it with a time format that can be specified by
the user (not the hardcoded
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2012-06-27 12:49:48 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
strptime() does parsing, not formatting. strftime() does formatting,
and you should use it
On 2012-06-27 15:07:29 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
It seems that you don't use strftime() with a time format specified
by the user. Or how can it be configurable without the patch?
We do use strftime() with
Am 27.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 15:07:29 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
It seems that you don't use strftime() with a time format specified
by the user. Or how can it be configurable without the
On 2012-06-27 22:31:24 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 27.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
Note: for coreutils, the format of timestamps of files is specified
by the $TIME_STYLE environment variable. I mention this because
timestamps of files and timestamps of feed items are a bit
Am 27.06.2012 23:10, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 22:31:24 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 27.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
Note: for coreutils, the format of timestamps of files is specified
by the $TIME_STYLE environment variable. I mention this because
timestamps of files
On 2012-06-27 23:50:30 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry, I hereby give up explaining my point.
You can patch Liferea so that one can have the -MM-DD hh:mm:ss
time format and document what the user should do in order to have
it.
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web:
Am 28.06.2012 00:10, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 23:50:30 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry, I hereby give up explaining my point.
You can patch Liferea so that one can have the -MM-DD hh:mm:ss
time format and document what the user should do in order to have it.
Sure I can but
On 2012-06-28 00:13:39 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 00:10, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 23:50:30 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry, I hereby give up explaining my point.
You can patch Liferea so that one can have the -MM-DD hh:mm:ss
time format and document what the
Am 28.06.2012 00:17, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-28 00:13:39 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 00:10, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 23:50:30 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry, I hereby give up explaining my point.
You can patch Liferea so that one can have the
On 2012-06-28 00:20:44 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 00:17, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-28 00:13:39 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 00:10, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-27 23:50:30 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry, I hereby give up explaining my point.
You
Am 16.06.2012 21:17, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
tags 667973 patch upstream
thanks
On 2012-06-16 20:38:52 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry guys. I dropped it for simplicity. As less and less work goes
into Liferea minor use cases have to be dropped for maintainting the
whole thing.
I really hate
On 2012-06-26 19:53:37 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Am 16.06.2012 21:17, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
On 2012-06-16 20:38:52 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
The idea was to radically simplify the date formatting by relying
only on a single glib method... (which ATM is not yet possible due
to a glib
found 667973 1.8.5-0.1
thanks
On 2012-04-07 22:20:20 +0300, Mike wrote:
After update to 1.8.3 liferea doesn't use date format specified by
date-format key in GConf.
I confirm. :(
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:
Sorry guys. I dropped it for simplicity. As less and less work goes into Liferea
minor use cases have to be dropped for maintainting the whole thing.
The idea was to radically simplify the date formatting by relying only on
a single glib method... (which ATM is not yet possible due to a glib
tags 667973 patch upstream
thanks
On 2012-06-16 20:38:52 +0200, Lars Windolf wrote:
Sorry guys. I dropped it for simplicity. As less and less work goes
into Liferea minor use cases have to be dropped for maintainting the
whole thing.
I really hate the default date format. I've attached an old
Package: liferea
Version: 1.8.3-0.1
Severity: normal
After update to 1.8.3 liferea doesn't use date format specified by date-format
key in GConf.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500,
22 matches
Mail list logo
