Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
On 2012-05-13 11:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Sven Joachim, le Sun 13 May 2012 10:31:29 +0200, a écrit : So now we have op=\E[49m\E[39m which does not resemble anything else in terminfo.src. Samuel, does it work? Yes it does. I uploaded ncurses 5.9-8 yesterday. What remains to be done is to rebuild bogl-bterm-udeb with the fixed ncurses-term, either via a binNMU on all arches or with a sourceful upload (perhaps bumping Depends and Build-Depends on ncurses-term to = 5.9-8). Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
Sven Joachim, le Mon 04 Jun 2012 20:44:38 +0200, a écrit : On 2012-05-13 11:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Sven Joachim, le Sun 13 May 2012 10:31:29 +0200, a écrit : So now we have op=\E[49m\E[39m which does not resemble anything else in terminfo.src. Samuel, does it work? Yes it does. I uploaded ncurses 5.9-8 yesterday. What remains to be done is to rebuild bogl-bterm-udeb with the fixed ncurses-term, either via a binNMU on all arches or with a sourceful upload (perhaps bumping Depends and Build-Depends on ncurses-term to = 5.9-8). Right, filed as Bug#676035. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
On 2012-05-13 01:30 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:15:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Sven Joachim, le Wed 02 May 2012 17:13:07 +0200, a ?crit :
| acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
| op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
This is the culprit.
| sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
for the same reason as sgr: \E49;39m is two parameters, which bterm can
not grok. Dropping 'op' makes the glitches go away.
oh. Actually there are two errors: the string is also missing '[' after
the 'E'. I'll put out an improved version in tonight's patch (which I
was almost done with...).
So now we have op=\E[49m\E[39m which does not resemble anything else in
terminfo.src. Samuel, does it work?
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
Sven Joachim, le Sun 13 May 2012 10:31:29 +0200, a écrit : So now we have op=\E[49m\E[39m which does not resemble anything else in terminfo.src. Samuel, does it work? Yes it does. I had some other glitch, but that was due to a color configuration in my .muttrc which was not taking into account that the default might be black on white, and not white on black. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Sven Joachim, le Sun 13 May 2012 10:31:29 +0200, a ?crit : So now we have op=\E[49m\E[39m which does not resemble anything else in terminfo.src. Samuel, does it work? Yes it does. I had some other glitch, but that was due to a color configuration in my .muttrc which was not taking into account that the default might be black on white, and not white on black. sounds good. I recall making that typo before, should add a warning to tic's checking, e.g., \E followed by something other than a digit or one of the special cases which correspond to a C1 control. It would take some tuning to make it usable though... -- Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
Hello,
Sven Joachim, le Wed 02 May 2012 17:13:07 +0200, a écrit :
| acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
| op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
This is the culprit.
| sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
for the same reason as sgr: \E49;39m is two parameters, which bterm can
not grok. Dropping 'op' makes the glitches go away.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:15:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Sven Joachim, le Wed 02 May 2012 17:13:07 +0200, a ?crit :
| acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
| op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
This is the culprit.
| sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
for the same reason as sgr: \E49;39m is two parameters, which bterm can
not grok. Dropping 'op' makes the glitches go away.
oh. Actually there are two errors: the string is also missing '[' after
the 'E'. I'll put out an improved version in tonight's patch (which I
was almost done with...).
--
Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
[ Adding Samuel to CC. ]
On 2012-05-03 12:27 +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 05:13:07PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Package: ncurses-term
Version: 5.9-7
Severity: normal
On 2012-05-01 12:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
There is however apparently a discrepancy between the
bogl-provided bterm and the ncurses-provided bterm (I assumed that they
were the same, but they are not), resulting in quite a few glitches e.g.
in mutt. The ncurses one is probably outdated, we will have to fix that.
It would be nice to have details (or a screenshot).
Indeed. Since I don't actually use bterm or mutt myself, this has to be
provided by Samuel, though.
Running infocmp shows the following differences (bterm-bogl being the
file from bogl 0.1.18-6, bterm-ncurses the file from ncurses-term
5.9-7):
,
| comparing bterm-bogl to bterm-ncurses.
| comparing booleans.
| comparing numbers.
| comparing strings.
|acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
|op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
|sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
`
right (I read the source-code using the Debian package as a reference,
and that's accurate enough barring updates past my review at the end of 2009).
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 05:13:07PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Package: ncurses-term
Version: 5.9-7
Severity: normal
On 2012-05-01 12:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
There is however apparently a discrepancy between the
bogl-provided bterm and the ncurses-provided bterm (I assumed that they
were the same, but they are not), resulting in quite a few glitches e.g.
in mutt. The ncurses one is probably outdated, we will have to fix that.
It would be nice to have details (or a screenshot).
Running infocmp shows the following differences (bterm-bogl being the
file from bogl 0.1.18-6, bterm-ncurses the file from ncurses-term
5.9-7):
,
| comparing bterm-bogl to bterm-ncurses.
| comparing booleans.
| comparing numbers.
| comparing strings.
| acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
| op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
| sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these:
qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
`
right (I read the source-code using the Debian package as a reference,
and that's accurate enough barring updates past my review at the end of 2009).
--
Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#671227: ncurses-term: glitches in bterm
Package: ncurses-term
Version: 5.9-7
Severity: normal
On 2012-05-01 12:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
There is however apparently a discrepancy between the
bogl-provided bterm and the ncurses-provided bterm (I assumed that they
were the same, but they are not), resulting in quite a few glitches e.g.
in mutt. The ncurses one is probably outdated, we will have to fix that.
Running infocmp shows the following differences (bterm-bogl being the
file from bogl 0.1.18-6, bterm-ncurses the file from ncurses-term
5.9-7):
,
| comparing bterm-bogl to bterm-ncurses.
| comparing booleans.
| comparing numbers.
| comparing strings.
| acsc: '``aaffggiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~',
'aajjkkllmmqqttuuxx'.
| op: NULL, '\E49;39m'.
| sgr: '\E[0m%?%p1%t\E[7m%;%?%p2%t\E[4m%;', NULL.
`
There are comments in ncurses' misc/terminfo.src regarding the
differences in acsc and sgr:
,
| # Notes:
| # bterm only supports acs using wide-characters, has case for these: qjxamlkut
| # bterm does not support sgr, since it only processes one parameter -TD
`
Comments from Samuel (X-Debbugs-CC'ed) would be highly welcome.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.4.0-rc5-nouveau (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
