Le Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:40:22PM +0200, Guillem Jover a écrit :
Given the above, i.e. the fact that this behaviour, even if rather
unfortunate has been present since the introduction of triggers and
as such makes affected packages having to workaround the problems for
now, and that fixing
Hi,
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hmmm, so I had prepared a patch which basically checks if the package
has its dependencies fulfilled before calling the postinst script with
triggered, and otherwise defers the trigger processing for later (but
only as long as it is not running
severity 671711 important
affects 671711 mono-tools
found 671711 dpkg/1.14.17
notfound 671711 monodoc-clutter-manual/1.0.0~alpha3~git20090817.r1.349dba6-8
notfound 671711 mono-tools/2.10-3
notfound 671711 octave-vrml/1.0.13-1
thanks
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 07:09:56 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi there,
[ dropping -devel ]
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:09:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
[…]
Hmmm, so I had prepared a patch which basically checks if the package
has its dependencies fulfilled before calling the postinst script with
triggered, and otherwise defers the trigger
Hi!
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:12:14 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[…]
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 08:30:28 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
Thanks a lot for your analysis. So it seems like this is the assumption
that isn't being held here: that dependencies will be satisfied when
postinst is run.
It would be great if you could prepare a patch. This issue could come up
reassign 671711 dpkg
affects 671711 src:monodoc-browser
thanks
Hi,
Reassigning to dpkg per Ian and full-quoting for context in the bug.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:05:12PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Iain Lane writes (Assumptions when processing triggers (was [pkg-mono-group]
Bug#671711
Greetings,
[ @ debian-dpkg, there is a question for you below ]
Thanks for the report.
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[…]
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the
8 matches
Mail list logo