On irc, I was told to send patches to xorg-devel@ to get them reviewed.
http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches/
Then I noticed header I add has already been unconditionally added in
upstream master so my part is useless.
Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
embedded drm header. Cleaner?
I'd update upstream bug as well.
Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?
--
G..e
diff -u xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-0.3.3/debian/changelog
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
embedded drm header. Cleaner?
copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just including a header.
Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?
If
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
embedded drm header. Cleaner?
copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:34:06 +0200, a écrit :
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
embedded drm header.
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:03:18PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
In the meantime, how about applying it
It's up to X maintainers to decide.
Pino didn't get any feedback from neither Debian nor upstream for 2
years, at least that's what bug trackers say.
No mail on openchrome mailing list
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Well, in the meanwhile the source code has changed, and would need
to be fixed to be buildable without libdrm, see via_memmgr.c having
a lot of unconditional uses of DRM_*. Perhaps we should rather give
up with porting
Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 16:55:08 +0200, a écrit :
+diff --git a/src/via_memmgr.c b/src/via_memmgr.c
+index 5d4cc3f..e174771 100644
+--- a/src/via_memmgr.c
b/src/via_memmgr.c
+@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ drm_bo_alloc_surface(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, unsigned int
width, unsigned int height,
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
+ pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
Err, this can not work: pitch becomes completely undefined...
Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)
Attached new workaround.
--
G..e
diff -u
Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
+ pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
Err, this can not work: pitch becomes completely undefined...
Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)
And again, see what I wrote: considering how drm seems to be stuffed
into its source code, I don't think we want to spend more time on the
openchrome driver; the dependency was already dropped from the xorg
package, we can just ask ftpmaster to drop the remaining previous
binaries.
Samuel
--
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
+ pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
Err, this can not work: pitch becomes
Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 23:50:40 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
+ pitch =
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 30 Jun 2013 11:50:05 +0200, a écrit :
Pino Toscano, le Sat 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200, a écrit :
The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI
support is enabled (and indeed
Hello,
Pino Toscano, le Sat 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200, a écrit :
The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI
support is enabled (and indeed there seems to be only libdrm usage in
the DRI-related
Package: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Version: 1:0.2.904+svn1050-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
currently, xserver-xorg-video-openchrome does not build on GNU/Hurd.
The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
16 matches
Mail list logo
