2012/5/18 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
On 18/05/12 17:52, Sebastian Harl wrote:
/usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
I think that is deliberate, and the user is expected to include it
first;
Uhm no. You should check such things on FreeBSD before jumping to
conclusions :-)
The
On 14:08, Robert Millan wrote:
2012/5/18 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
On 18/05/12 17:52, Sebastian Harl wrote:
/usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
I think that is deliberate, and the user is expected to include it
first;
Uhm no. You should check such things on FreeBSD
On 14:44, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
So due to this kludge, some headers must now include sys/types.h
Ummm that's probably not true either, I've just saw the commit fixing this.
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
2012/5/19 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
So due to this kludge, some headers must now include sys/types.h, because on
upstream FreeBSD the appropriate definition would be been provided by GCC?
No, headers can rely on stddef.h for size_t as usual.
It's just kvm.h which tries to be
Package: libkvm-dev
Version: 9.0+ds1-2
Severity: important
Hi,
/usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
tokkee@kfreebsd:~$ cat kvm-test.c
#include kvm.h
int main(void) { return 0; }
tokkee@kfreebsd:~$ gcc kvm-test.c
In file included from kvm-test.c:1:0:
/usr/include/kvm.h:45:1:
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertags 673431 kfreebsd
thanks
Hi,
On 18/05/12 17:52, Sebastian Harl wrote:
/usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
I think that is deliberate, and the user is expected to include it
first; I have no idea if or where this is documented, but I'm sure it
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:25:50PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 18/05/12 17:52, Sebastian Harl wrote:
/usr/include/kvm.h requires sys/types.h:
I think that is deliberate, and the user is expected to include it
first;
Well, I usually expect headers to be self-contained ;-) But
7 matches
Mail list logo
