Hi,
On 2012-06-05 17:24, shawn wrote:
https://github.com/shawnl/htop
Ok.
Please don't top-post, please also always send bugreport-related mails
to bug address, not to me only.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++ GNU/Linux developer, Debian Developer
package htop
forwarded 673626
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3528569group_id=108839atid=651633
quit
Hello,
On 2012-05-20 17:00, shawn wrote:
here is the patch(s), there is no [2/5] that was me removing the
autogenerated header files from my git so that I wouldn't have to
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:44 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Ack, thanks, I forwarded your report upstream.
less sucky version of patch 1
--
-Shawn Landden
From 3a07e3cc9c1d85e42b883abc64a43a5eaccf4aa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 20 May
Package: htop
Version: 1.0.1-1em1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The starttime column can show inaccurate times if you remount your /proc, as
recently happened in my system. (well, I'm not sure this is what it is, but
after
reading the source, this seems the most likely cause-I am using systemd
Hello,
Thank you for the report.
On 2012-05-20 03:26, shawn wrote:
[...]
The starttime column can show inaccurate times if you remount your /proc, as
recently happened in my system. (well, I'm not sure this is what it is, but
after
reading the source, this seems the most likely cause-I am
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 13:47 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the report.
On 2012-05-20 03:26, shawn wrote:
[...]
The starttime column can show inaccurate times if you remount your /proc, as
recently happened in my system. (well, I'm not sure this is what it is,
6 matches
Mail list logo
