On 13.04.2013 12:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG
9.1
support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
The fixes for
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1
support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the
Attached are two patches that should allow Slony 2.0.7 to work with PG 9.1
I've run slony with these patches through a number of runs of the
clustertest suites and everything works as expected (lots of other bugs
fixed in 2.1 and 2.2 are still present)
Steve
From
On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1
support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for the
MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstream
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1
support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for the
MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstream bug #285) I think will
produce a working
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead
upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead
upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql
9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to slony
8 matches
Mail list logo