Bug#680036: marked as done (fonts-migmix: license changed from M+/IPA dual one to IPA single one)
Hi, Hideki, reopen is ok. At Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:21:55 +0900, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote: Thanks for your quick fix, but don't do that. Because upstream don't understand its license change is legal or not, migmix contains glyphs from M+ but this version ignore M+'s license - is it okay? (probably, no). I follow upstream decision. We should talk to upstream and IPA folks about IPAFont license. It's nice. Thanks in advance. --- Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org uwab...@debian.or.jp GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680036: marked as done (fonts-migmix: license changed from M+/IPA dual one to IPA single one)
reopen 680036 thanks Hi Youhei, Thanks for your quick fix, but don't do that. Because upstream don't understand its license change is legal or not, migmix contains glyphs from M+ but this version ignore M+'s license - is it okay? (probably, no). We should talk to upstream and IPA folks about IPAFont license. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
