Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2014-04-19 Thread Bernd Neuhaus
Package: upgrade-reports Followup-For: Bug #680626 Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action?

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-07 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:43:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello, On Sun, 05 Aug 2012, Robert Luberda wrote: Processing triggers for doc-base ... /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck dpkg: error

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 14:37:10 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: However, when I ldd /usr/bin/python, it seems to be linked against libssl, so I'm wondering if this bug isn't related to the python package missing a dependency against libssl. It also seem to be linked against

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Sun, 05 Aug 2012, Robert Luberda wrote: Processing triggers for doc-base ... /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/auto/UUID/UUID.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck dpkg: error processing doc-base (--unpack): subprocess installed

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-05 Thread Robert Luberda
Julien Cristau wrote: As a variation on this theme (triggers being run when the triggered package is unconfigured in the middle of an upgrade from squeeze to wheezy), I just got the following: Processing triggers for doc-base ... /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-03 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711, which I'm not planning on

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:04:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: The current behaviour of triggers is well documented. triggers.txt.gz says Packages in t-awaited and t-pending demand satisfaction of their dependencies just like package in installed. The current behaviour doesn't seem to satisfy

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 14:51:32 +0200, bertagaz wrote: In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step. I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested from it. I wanted first to see if it would be possible to

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-02 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711, which I'm not planning on

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-08-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: I can understand the reasons not to fix the trigger bug, sounds like something not that tricky. However, given how it actually break the upgrade process, and will like likely in the future, it would probably be a good idea to document somewhere for

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-07-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711, which I'm not planning on fixing for wheezy as it would introduce regressions on other

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-07-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711, which I'm not planning on fixing for wheezy as it would introduce regressions on other situations, and given that this behaviour has been around since the

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-07-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 14:51:32 +0200, bertagaz wrote: In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step. I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested from it. I wanted first to see if it would be possible to

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-07-15 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 17:14:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 14:51:32 +0200, bertagaz wrote: In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step. I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested

Bug#680626: Squeeze-Wheezy: dist-upgrade fails, /usr/bin/python unable to load libssl.so.1.0.0

2012-07-07 Thread bertagaz
Package: upgrade-reports Severity: normal Hi, In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step. I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested from it. I wanted first to see if it would be possible to upgrade with a