Hi,
I wonder what this problem might be sitplus as well as libpoco-dev are
in unstable. I can not see what action needs to be done here. Please
explain.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: sitplus
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
┌──┐
│ Install sitplus build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
│
└──┘
Installing build dependencies
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-sitplus-dummy : Depends: libpoco-dev but it is not
going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/08/sitplus_1.0.3-3_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
___
Debian-med-packaging mailing list
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
