On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:39:17PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
Then it turned out there were some arch-specific FTBS problems that I
managed to track down, with help, during DebConf. So now I wanted to
see if you thought that emacs24 might still be appropriate for Wheezy,
or if it just needs
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Is emacs23 in good shape for the release?
I don't think there's a lot of RC work, but I need to check a few things
there (and with emacsen-common).
PS: Your efforts fixing it up are appreciated, but it's just way too late to
add a new package at this
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:59:25 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
Just to double-check, do I need to do anything to have emacs24 pulled
from testing (or is that documented somewhere I should read)?
It's not in testing, and has never been there.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:59:25 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
Just to double-check, do I need to do anything to have emacs24 pulled
from testing (or is that documented somewhere I should read)?
It's not in testing, and has never been there.
Oh, OK.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Emacs 24.1 was recently released upstream, and emacs24 24.1+1-1 made it
for the freeze, but just barely.
Then it turned out there were some arch-specific FTBS problems that I
managed to track down, with help, during DebConf. So now I wanted to
see
5 matches
Mail list logo