Bug#684124: lxc-ls ignores /etc/default/lxc
Package: lxc Version: 0.8.0~rc1-4 Seems that lxc-ls ignores the LXC_DIRECTORY path defined in /etc/default/lxc. This is a serious problem, since lxc-ls is used internally by other lxc scripts. AFAICS the problem is also in 0.8.0~rc1-9. Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684124: lxc-ls ignores /etc/default/lxc
retitle 684124 please evaluate /etc/default/lxc in lxc-ls found 684124 0.8.0~rc1-9 severity 684124 wishlist tag 684124 pending thanks On 08/07/2012 09:59 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: This is a serious problem no, it's not. /var/lib/lxc is supposed to always a symlink to the actual lxc directory if the lxc directory is elsewhere (which is what the package ensures), it's a purely cosmetical issue. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684124: lxc-ls ignores /etc/default/lxc
On 08/07/12 10:38, Daniel Baumann wrote: no, it's not. /var/lib/lxc is supposed to always a symlink to the actual lxc directory if the lxc directory is elsewhere (which is what the package ensures), it's a purely cosmetical issue. Sorry, but I don't see why using /var/lib/lxc should be mandatory. Upstream's documentation doesn't say so, but maybe I have missed it? Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
