Small update: I've reproduced this myself. It seems to be
because of a difference in FIU from 0.14 to 0.90.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Indeed, the command line flags for fiu-ctrl have changed.
The old flags (-e and -d) are still accepted but sliently
ignored; instead of a proper error message, it simply
produced incorrect behavior.
I updated the tests that use FIU and now all tests pass
for me. You can see the change at
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Keith Rarick k...@xph.us wrote:
You can see the change at
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/compare/fiu
Just to be really explicit, the only relevant change right
now is https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/commit/3176e28.
That compare view also lists another
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:20:11AM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Keith Rarick k...@xph.us wrote:
You can see the change at
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/compare/fiu
Thanks. No need for an upstream release.
I'll also drop -i from the fiu-ctrl invocation
That's fine Keith. Let me know please when you have something ready.
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Keith,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:03:45PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote:
If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd
working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release.
Not, it's not an option.
Should I do that?
Your previous email sort of implied that you wouldn't
Hey, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I wouldn't make a
fix. I said before I'm happy to maintain 1.4.x for several
years and that's still true.
As part of my responsibility maintaining 1.4.x, I was just
trying to start with the most expedient reasonable option,
which would have been to use
If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd
working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release.
Should I do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Keith,
beanstalkd 1.4.6 does not pass anymore the test binlog-diskfull-delete.sh.
(Just a reminder: 1.4.6 is the version intended for the upcoming Debian
stable, since 1.5 1.6 had failing tests and were not fixed before the Debian
freeze deadline.)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:07:51PM +0200,
A number of people have reported problems using libevent 2.
I'd suggest sticking to libevent 1.4; that is the version that
beanstalkd was developed and tested with.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Source: beanstalkd
Version: 1.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
11 matches
Mail list logo
