Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-10-26 Thread Werner Detter
Hi Adam, just a short question - what about the policyd-weight package in backports? regards, Werner Am 22.09.12 21:19, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Werner Detter wrote:

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-10-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.10.2012 12:51, Werner Detter wrote: just a short question - what about the policyd-weight package in backports? Sorry, I'm not sure what the question is here. If you're trying to get the package on backports.debian.org updated, I believe the usual approach is to contact whoever

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Thanks for the quick response. That looks better, but... :-) You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Werner Detter
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu The policyd-weight package in stable should be updated as it still uses a non functional DNSBL. Furthermore the DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org will be shut down on 2012-11-30 (the announcement

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:10 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: The policyd-weight package in stable should be updated as it still uses a non functional DNSBL. Furthermore the DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org will be shut down on 2012-11-30 (the announcement from the lists operator can be found here:

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Werner Detter
Hi, That looks a little odd. Those changes should be included in the debdiff. If you unpack the new .dsc, does the result include the patches? Just discovered a Typo in the naming of the patches. Fixed that and rebuilded the package again, here's the actual debdiff. Thanks, Werner

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:36 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: That looks a little odd. Those changes should be included in the debdiff. If you unpack the new .dsc, does the result include the patches? Just discovered a Typo in the naming of the patches. Fixed that and rebuilded the package

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Werner Detter
Hi, Thanks for the quick response. That looks better, but... :-) You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've downloaded the current source package again and added my patches from scratch. I hope it's OK now :) Regards, Werner werner@squeeze:~$ debdiff

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1

2012-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Thanks for the quick response. That looks better, but... :-) You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've downloaded the current source package again and added my