On 29/12/15 22:37, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> Just a little nudge here again!
> Ubuntu 16.04 (which is a Long Term Support release) has a Debian Import
> Freeze on the February 18th, and for Virtuoso 7.2 to make it in, it should
> have an update in Debian well before that.
> I'm neither an
Hi all!
Just a little nudge here again!
Ubuntu 16.04 (which is a Long Term Support release) has a Debian Import
Freeze on the February 18th, and for Virtuoso 7.2 to make it in, it should
have an update in Debian well before that.
I'm neither an Ubuntu or Virtuoso user, but I think it is
Hi all!
Since there shouldn't be any obstacles in terms of version dependencies, I
figure I'll just bump everyone. I'm not using Virtuoso these days, but I
think it is important for the Semantic Web community that the most recent
version is in there, and I hope it can be fixed so that it can
¡Hola Tim!
El 2015-02-03 a las 17:22 +, Tim Haynes escribió:
OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards. But we
have things to show!
Well, jessie was released and as such, we can try to work on the packages
hand passing.
The current develop/7 branch on
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 17:22:11 Tim Haynes wrote:
[snip]
It seems this would be a fortuitous moment to ask: if I'm wanted to be
regarded as the VOS maintainer in Debian, how do I go about officially
signing on?
First you need to wait until us the current maintainers orphan the package.
Nice work!
Cheers,
Nolan
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net wrote:
On Tuesday 3. February 2015 17.22.11 Tim Haynes wrote:
OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards.
:-)
But we have things to show!
The current develop/7
On Tuesday 3. February 2015 17.22.11 Tim Haynes wrote:
OK, it's been a little more than a couple of days even by my standards.
:-)
But we have things to show!
The current develop/7 branch on github
https://github.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource/ contains a completely
revamped debian/
On 2 October 2014 at 09:24, Tim Haynes thay...@openlinksw.com wrote:
I'm working with the other VOS admin/developers here to get this branch
published on github, so that will at least give something concrete to
test and
we can take it from there how it makes its way into Debian.
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 13:07:13 Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
Hi all!
Alternatively, a more conservative approach is to upload 6.1.8 to unstable,
and 7.1 to experimental. If no problems occurs with 6.1.8, it is likely that
the assumption that exactly 6.1.6 is required is wrong, then 6.1.8
On 1 October 2014 17:20, Maximiliano Curia m...@gnuservers.com.ar wrote:
El 2014-10-01 a las 12:41 +0100, Tim Haynes escribió:
On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net wrote:
I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting
Virtuoso 7
into
Hi all!
I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso 7
into Debian proper?
Jessie freezes soon, so it'll have to happen very soon now, if it is to go
in. If it has to go through the NEW queue, my guess is that it is already
too late.
However, we have the word
On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net wrote:
I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso 7
into Debian proper?
Hi, thanks for the wake-up call...
I did a bit of work on this a few months ago - essentially porting the
Ubuntu package
¡Hola Tim!
El 2014-10-01 a las 12:41 +0100, Tim Haynes escribió:
On 1 October 2014 12:07, Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net wrote:
I was wondering if there's any progress on the effort on getting Virtuoso
7
into Debian proper?
Hi, thanks for the wake-up call...
I did a bit of
On 13 June 2014 14:37, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as
an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to
On Friday 13 June 2014 09:37:48 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Tim Haynes wrote:
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
[2]http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack
as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update
package
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update
On Monday 16 June 2014 11:51:39 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
[snip]
do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
misunderstanding?
I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not
have
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
do you see obvious warning points to keep in mind? there seems to be
not that many dependents on virtuoso's components, or am I
misunderstanding?
I don't remember virtuoso's internals, but for example the binaries can not
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:20:24 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Do you see any dependent packages present in Debian which require those
binaries and would not be compatible somehow with 8.1?
The entire KDE stack needs the exact current version in the archive. And no,
it is not compatible with
On Monday 16 June 2014 12:43:25 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous
comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso.
But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses
virtuoso
and
Hi Tim,
We are looking to get virtuoso updated in Debian. I was referred to
http://wiki.lod2.eu/display/LOD2DOC/Installation+of+a+local+LOD2+stack as an
alternative source and I see that you have done some work to update package
(from Ubuntu) for the 7.1 release.
Since you had some experience
On 10.06.2014 20:27, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Tuesday 10. June 2014 18.30.01 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
As far as I understand we need this exact version of virtuoso for
nepomuk. No older, no newer.
Yes, KDE is switching to baloo, which is actually sitting in NEW IIRC.
But
Debian is about to freeze in a few months, and we would need to have a
recent release available for some NeuroDebian related projects. It
would be great if 7.1.0 gets into jessie.
If there is anything we could help with -- please let us know.
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
On Tuesday 10. June 2014 12.33.49 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Debian is about to freeze in a few months, and we would need to have a
recent release available for some NeuroDebian related projects. It
would be great if 7.1.0 gets into jessie.
If there is anything we could help with -- please
First of all, while I'm part of the Qt/KDE team I haven't been paying
attention to the KDE stuff lately, so please don't take this as the team's
words but just mine.
As far as I understand we need this exact version of virtuoso for nepomuk. No
older, no newer.
Yes, KDE is switching to baloo,
On Tuesday 10. June 2014 18.30.01 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
As far as I understand we need this exact version of virtuoso for
nepomuk. No older, no newer.
Yes, KDE is switching to baloo, which is actually sitting in NEW IIRC.
But that doesn't means that everything has
29 matches
Mail list logo
