On Mon 28 Jan 2013 at 10:58:38 +, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
In particular we need authorative advice for users of:
1. startx
How should startx users start their sessions? Is the aforementioned way
sufficient? What other changes have to be made in order to ensure a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 14:58 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
I probably won't get around to it sending you a detailed answer this
week. Hopefully next week. Please poke me again if you haven't heard
from me until then.
Feel yourself poked. :)
I would very much like to write this important bit of
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:05 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
Hi Wolodja,
Thanks a lot for your helpful suggestion! I agree with you :)
Could you please do a
svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en
and hack up some DocBook XML code to get your text in?
Hi,
I probably won't get around to it sending you a detailed answer this
week. Hopefully next week. Please poke me again if you haven't heard
from me until then.
If my memory serves me well, the workaround/solution for using startx
from the console involves adding pam_loginuid/pam_ck_connector to
Hi Wolodja,
Thanks a lot for your helpful suggestion! I agree with you :)
Could you please do a
svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en
and hack up some DocBook XML code to get your text in? That'd allow me to fix
this issue even more soon.
If not, I'll get to
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:54:09 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
tags 690127 +help
thanks
Hi,
Tobias: thanks for reporting this issue, it's important indeed. I am trying
to
write a patch explaining the issue.
Is this correct:
@bugs.d.o doesn't go to the submitter, you need
tags 690127 +help
thanks
Hi,
Tobias: thanks for reporting this issue, it's important indeed. I am trying to
write a patch explaining the issue.
Is this correct:
---
Users of display managers other than kdm, gdm and lightdm (e.g. the xdm and
slim display managers) as well as users who start
Hello,
I've just stumbled over this report and have to say that the proposed section
in the release notes is suboptimal. This is mainly due because it is unclear
which workaround is actually being referred to in the linked bug reports.
I would prefer it if the actual changes that are needed are
8 matches
Mail list logo
