Hi,
Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Hello Cyril,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote on 2012-10-28 22:58:
>
> > getting fixed in beta3. Are you sure you didn't try beta1?
>
> I thinks then I had the old beta1 version.
> Thanks for your reply.
Would you mind testing beta3 on your hardware to be sure?
Holger
Hello Cyril,
Cyril Brulebois wrote on 2012-10-28 22:58:
> getting fixed in beta3. Are you sure you didn't try beta1?
I thinks then I had the old beta1 version.
Thanks for your reply.
---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello Joachim,
here's what Holger replied:
Holger Wansing (23/10/2012):
> I tested the lilo bootloader on a x86 Virtual Box with the beta3
> netinst CD image:
> - Installation was a complete success.
> - Booting the new system also works without problems.
> (The /etc/lilo.conf also contains th
Hi,
I tested the lilo bootloader on a x86 Virtual Box with the beta3 netinst
CD image:
- Installation was a complete success.
- Booting the new system also works without problems.
(The /etc/lilo.conf also contains the initrd line.)
So, no problem with lilo on x86 AFAICS.
Thanks
Holger
--
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Version: beta2
Tags: d-i
While testing the new installer image with d-i beta2 on amd64 system
I found a large problem installing with lilo as boot manager:
In the file /etc/lilo.conf the line for the initrd is missing!
So every installation gives an k
5 matches
Mail list logo