On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:06:40AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
please consider uploading the new freedoom beta release.
Would you mind if I took care of that myself?
No problem - please go ahead!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Am 26.10.2012 10:16, schrieb Jon Dowland:
No problem - please go ahead!
Done.
I've seen you removed yourself from Uploaders, so I changed the
packaging style to meet my own. I hope you don't mind.
I'd say the package is ready for upload. It is currently targeted at
unstable, maybe this
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:13:45AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.10.2012 10:16, schrieb Jon Dowland:
No problem - please go ahead!
Done.
Great stuff!
One question: why 1.8~beta1 for the upstream release? Why not
1.8-beta1 (matching the upstream tarball more closely)
I've seen you
Am 26.10.2012 11:41, schrieb Jon Dowland:
One question: why 1.8~beta1 for the upstream release? Why not
1.8-beta1 (matching the upstream tarball more closely)
Because that's recommended by Policy:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html#f37
Releases with '~' sort earlier than
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.10.2012 11:41, schrieb Jon Dowland:
One question: why 1.8~beta1 for the upstream release? Why not
1.8-beta1 (matching the upstream tarball more closely)
Because that's recommended by Policy:
5 matches
Mail list logo
