Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1

2012-11-16 Thread GUO Yixuan
Control: retitle -1 unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-3 Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:49:56PM +0800, GUO Yixuan wrote: On 11/13/2012 05:36 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 13:57 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: This upload updates document for gcc 4.4 branch, removes

Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1

2012-11-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 13:49:56 +0800, GUO Yixuan wrote: Well, apart from changes in debian/, changes in upstream part compressed to over 60k... certainly more than the 40k limit. (I suppose the canonical place for unblock request is the bts, so it doesn't matter too much to be absent from

Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1

2012-11-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 11:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 13:49:56 +0800, GUO Yixuan wrote: Well, apart from changes in debian/, changes in upstream part compressed to over 60k... certainly more than the 40k limit. (I suppose the canonical place for unblock request

Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1

2012-11-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 13:57 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: This upload updates document for gcc 4.4 branch, removes gcc-doc-base (provided by gcc-4.7-doc) and gcj-4.4-doc (gcj-4.4 already removed from wheezy). The packaging style was updated to match gcc-4.6-doc/gcc-4.7-doc. Given that we're in a

Bug#691814: Bug #691814: Re: unblock: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1

2012-11-12 Thread GUO Yixuan
On 11/13/2012 05:36 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 13:57 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: This upload updates document for gcc 4.4 branch, removes gcc-doc-base (provided by gcc-4.7-doc) and gcj-4.4-doc (gcj-4.4 already removed from wheezy). The packaging style was updated to match