Bug#692927: debian-installer: Unable to finish installation using btrfs and traditional partitioning

2013-01-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (30/12/2012):
 Additional info on this topic was also given in
 https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/11/msg00442.html
 and 
 https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/11/msg00084.html

Thanks for the pointers.

I'm not sure errata is the right way to advertise this. I'd expect
errata to be something we catch after the fact, and expect to fix at
some point. btrfs looks like something that won't be usable for
wheezy, and I think advertising against it in the manual is the way to
go.

Comments, anyone?

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#692927: debian-installer: Unable to finish installation using btrfs and traditional partitioning

2012-12-30 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
 speaking of btrfs, it doesn't seem to be mentioned on:
   http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch06s03.html.en#di-partition
   http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.amd64/ch06s03.html#di-partition
 
 Until somebody digs into btrfs-related constraints, maybe we should
 warn against that FS anyway, since AFAICT it's still dog-slow anyway.

Additional info on this topic was also given in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/11/msg00442.html
and 
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/11/msg00084.html


Holger

-- 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2
under  D e b i a n   G N U / L I N U X   6.0  ( S q u e e z e )
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://linuxcounter.net/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#692927: debian-installer: Unable to finish installation using btrfs and traditional partitioning

2012-12-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

Gábor J.Tóth debb...@jnet.hu (10/11/2012):
 Package: debian-installer
 Severity: normal
 Tags: d-i
 
 
 I tried a clean install of Wheezy, on a machine with traditional 
 partitioning (i.e., first partition starting on sector 65).  I assigned a
 single partition to this setup, and selected btrfs for it.  After the 
 installation completed, grub installation failed, complaining Your 
 core.img is unusually large. It won't fit in the embedding area..
 
 I now realize that the core.img with btrfs support is indeed too
 large to install into the 32k available in front of the first
 partition, but this realization required a good deal of googling.
 What would be helpful, however, is to warn the user up front that
 this setup isn't going to work, that they either need a different
 partitioning scheme (e.g., bigger whole before the first partition),
 a separate, non-btrfs boot partition, or not use btrfs.

speaking of btrfs, it doesn't seem to be mentioned on:
  http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch06s03.html.en#di-partition
  http://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.amd64/ch06s03.html#di-partition

Until somebody digs into btrfs-related constraints, maybe we should
warn against that FS anyway, since AFAICT it's still dog-slow anyway.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#692927: debian-installer: Unable to finish installation using btrfs and traditional partitioning

2012-11-10 Thread Gábor J . Tóth
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i


I tried a clean install of Wheezy, on a machine with traditional 
partitioning (i.e., first partition starting on sector 65).  I assigned a
single partition to this setup, and selected btrfs for it.  After the 
installation completed, grub installation failed, complaining Your 
core.img is unusually large. It won't fit in the embedding area..

I now realize that the core.img with btrfs support is indeed too large to
install into the 32k available in front of the first partition, but
this realization required a good deal of googling.  What would be helpful,
however, is to warn the user up front that this setup isn't going to work,
that they either need a different partitioning scheme (e.g., bigger whole
before the first partition), a separate, non-btrfs boot partition, or not use
btrfs.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org