Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2019-10-14 Thread Fernando Toledo
Hi People, i'm back (sorry i very busy with work/study) =| On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:35:05 +0200 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Bart Martens already changed the metadata of #693230 to match your > intentions. very good, thanks! > > The next step for you would be to seek a sponsor to review and

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2019-08-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
[ dropping #806572 as that bug is closed and archived ] Hi, On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:47:37PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: > https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail > > I upload to mentors: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail > > I see that the package is orphaned, i can adopt

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2019-08-01 Thread Fernando Toledo
Hi people! I'm working on version 0.52 https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail I upload to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail I see that the package is orphaned, i can adopt it, but i'm not DD, how to can i help and procced to upload to unstable? Thanks! -- Fernando

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-05-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Robert! On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > haven't > been able to work on this as much as I'd like... Should I perhaps > temporarily > close the RFS bug and reopen it when I have an

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-03-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > haven't > been able to work on this as much as I'd like... life sometimes gets in the middle of this, yeah... > Should I perhaps temporarily > close

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-03-03 Thread Robert James Clay
Hi Mattia! On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 01:16:20 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > > Hi Tobias! > > > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Robert! On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > Hi Tobias! > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Robert James Clay
Hi Tobias! On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? > > > >The non vendor