Bug#693385: expecting no as an answer to unblock: bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1]. Reading through the discussion of a later CVE bug in bind9 [2], my expectation regarding the unblock bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1 request is that the answer will be no, due to: And then we're talking about a version that does this over the version in testing: 2248 files changed, 71094 insertions(+), 36757 deletions(-) And about software whose bug tracking system and VCS are both proprietary. So one cannot even sanely review it as the context information from the RT tickets is not publicly available. [typo corrected] Agreed, we can proceed with backporting further security fixes for Wheezy based on 9.8.1. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693385: expecting no as an answer to unblock: bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1
Hi, I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1]. Reading through the discussion of a later CVE bug in bind9 [2], my expectation regarding the unblock bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1 request is that the answer will be no, due to: And then we're talking about a version that does this over the version in testing: 2248 files changed, 71094 insertions(+), 36757 deletions(-) And about software whose bug tracking system and VCS are both proprietary. So one cannot even sanely review it as the context information from the RT tickets is not publicly available. [typo corrected] Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/11/msg3.html [ Unblocks and Freeze Policy ] [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695192 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
