Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-03-23 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Control: tag -1 -pending Removing months-old pending tag. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-03-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: tag -1 -patch Removing tag since the proposed patch is incomplete. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-01-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On 13/01/13 00:25, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 21:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote: This sounds very familiar. I considered this approach for Telepathy, but rejected it because of problems like this. BTW, Debian strongly discourages embedded code copies:

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-01-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 at 10:40:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: The source code that is in this package is all generated (see below) and as far as I can tell, despite build-depending on the required source (fso-specs) and the tools (vala-dbus-binding-tool) required to build that source, the build

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2013-01-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 21:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote: This sounds very familiar. I considered this approach for Telepathy, but rejected it because of problems like this. There is a fix for this bug available in NEW: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libfso-glib_2012.07.27.2-1.html BTW,

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2012-12-04 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: severity -1 important Hi Paul, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:40:22AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Not sure if this bug should be RC or not, please downgrade it if not. Either way, I suppose it should be wheezy-ignore since fixing it will probably require a transition. As your bug report is

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2012-12-04 Thread Paul Wise
Control: severity -1 serious On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 17:30 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: As your bug report is not meant for wheezy, I'm downgrading this bug. Downgrading the bug is not the way to do this. If the bug should not block the wheezy release, ask the release team for a wheezy-ignore

Bug#693577: libfso-glib: not properly built from source (actual source is in fso-specs)

2012-11-17 Thread Paul Wise
Source: libfso-glib Severity: serious Usertags: built-using sentpatch Tags: patch Not sure if this bug should be RC or not, please downgrade it if not. Either way, I suppose it should be wheezy-ignore since fixing it will probably require a transition. The source code that is in this package is