Hi,
I'm an xdotool user (it's called from my .xsession on all my boxes
with X) and the package maintainer of one of libxdo's reverse
dependencies, keynav.
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
[…]
I don't know what the right thing to do is, frankly. I could support
either completely disabling the test
On 03/27/2013 01:36 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
For me xdotool 1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u2 (amd64) from TPU works fine
in my daily usage.
I was able to replicate (some of?) the buildd failures manually by
building under a buildd-similar set of constraints:
env -i PATH=/usr/bin:/bin SHELL=/bin/sh
Sigh. the debdiff said unstable, but clearly it should have said
testing-proposed-updates instead. attached is the correct debdiff.
--dkg
diff -Nru xdotool-2.20100701.2961/debian/changelog
xdotool-2.20100701.2961/debian/changelog
--- xdotool-2.20100701.2961/debian/changelog
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I was able to replicate (some of?) the buildd failures manually by
building under a buildd-similar set of constraints:
env -i PATH=/usr/bin:/bin SHELL=/bin/sh dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us
/dev/null
(from:
On Fri 2013-02-08 11:21:32 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 02/08/2013 04:58 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unfortunately that FTBFS in the same way that +deb7u1 did. :-( I'm
wondering if this is related to the build environment in some way.
Daniel - did you use sbuild, pbuilder or something
On 08.02.2013 03:14, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2013-02-06 17:25:37 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If you think it's worth it, i'll set aside some time to work on this
tomorrow, to get 1:2.20100701.2961-3 to build cleanly against stock
wheezy.
I've just uploaded
On 02/08/2013 04:58 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unfortunately that FTBFS in the same way that +deb7u1 did. :-( I'm
wondering if this is related to the build environment in some way.
Daniel - did you use sbuild, pbuilder or something else for your upload?
I used a manually-built minimal kvm
On Wed 2013-02-06 17:25:37 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
If you think it's worth it, i'll set aside some time to work on this
tomorrow, to get 1:2.20100701.2961-3 to build cleanly against stock wheezy.
I've just uploaded 1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u2 to
testing-proposed-updates.
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 22:31 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unfortunately, it fails everywhere anyway. :-( There are several
failures of the form
[...]
Ping?
Ideas welcome...
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Ideas welcome...
At this point I’d vote to disable the testsuite entirely for getting
this into wheezy.
Daniel, what do you say?
--
Best regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 02/06/2013 04:48 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Ideas welcome...
At this point I’d vote to disable the testsuite entirely for getting
this into wheezy.
Daniel, what do you say?
I recently learned from upstream that some of
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 22:31 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unfortunately, it fails everywhere anyway. :-( There are several
failures of the form
Error: test_windowraise_fails_on_invalid_window(XdotoolBasicTests)
EOFError: end of file reached
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 22:31:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 02:36 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
I would like to upload xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #680824 in wheezy. At
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 02:36 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
I would like to upload xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #680824 in wheezy. At the moment,
1:2.20100701.2961-3 is in wheezy and 1:2.20110530.1-6
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Hello,
I would like to upload xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #680824 in wheezy. At the moment,
1:2.20100701.2961-3 is in wheezy and 1:2.20110530.1-6
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 31.12.2012 19:13, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
I would like to upload xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #680824 in wheezy. At the moment,
1:2.20100701.2961-3 is in wheezy and 1:2.20110530.1-6 (many
changes) is in unstable.
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
I would like to upload xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #680824 in wheezy. At the moment,
1:2.20100701.2961-3 is in wheezy and 1:2.20110530.1-6 (many
changes) is in unstable.
Please go ahead;
17 matches
Mail list logo
