Hi Raphael, Kelson
On 10:14 Sun 20 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> > What about "libopenzim" as package name, content unchanged?
>
> Looks reasonable to me.
I just talked with Kelson what he meant is only package renaming and
nothing will be ch
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> What about "libopenzim" as package name, content unchanged?
Looks reasonable to me.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
Le 20/01/2013 06:20, Vasudev Kamath a écrit :
> On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>>> I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
>>> betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
> > betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
> > in the package name there is description fie
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash
> betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim
> in the package name there is description field which clarifies any
> confusion between both packages for
Hi Raphaël,
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > I will ask upstream
>
> Thanks.
>
> > But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
> > sense. What do you think?
>
> I don't agree with this statement. Comin
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > I will ask upstream
>
> Thanks.
>
Just an update Emmanuel started a discussion on whether to get the
project renamed and possible names here [1]
He has asked me for some time before he can revert bac
Engelheart
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#698111: ITP: zimlib -- Standard library implementation of
ZIM specifications
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20130114101420.ga9...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com>
On 11:14 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> I will ask upstream
Thanks.
> But as I said name is actually abbreviation and renaming it doesn't make
> sense. What do you think?
I don't agree with this statement. Coming up with a name is always a
creative endeavour and you can always come up with
Hi Raphaël,
On 10:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> When I saw this, it got me clearly confused because at first I thought
> that it was related to http://zim-wiki.org/. It's a bit unfortunate that
> "Zim" is used to refer to two projects reladed to "wikis".
zim in zimlib is actually
Git repository for zimlib shows rename was done in 2009, zim was
already a few years old at that time.
Afraid little I can do to resolve the clash other than renaming my
application, which needless to say, I don't want to because I like the
name.
Regards,
Jaap
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM,
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> * Package name: zimlib
> Version : 0.93.20121015-1
> * URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib
> .
> ZIM is a file format created with focus on extracting and encoding data
> from Mediawiki for offline use. Even th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath
* Package name: zimlib
Version : 0.93.20121015-1
Upstream Author : Tommi Maekitalo
* URL : http://www.openzim.org/index.php/Zimlib
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Standard lib
13 matches
Mail list logo
