On 2013-12-28 23:23:32 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Sorry, I don't know what happened when I sent that mail. So I did a patch to
solve this problem but I can't test it due to not having an x86 machine. Can
you try applying the attached patch to the upstream development branch and
tell
Le mardi 24 décembre 2013, 16:20:23 Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
Sorry, I don't know what happened when I sent that mail. So I did a patch to
solve this problem but I can't test it due to not having an x86 machine. Can
you try applying the attached patch to the upstream development branch and
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2013 15:40:31, vous avez écrit :
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.26~git20120612.ad5f375-6
Severity: normal
Hi Vincent,
sorry for answering so late.
TCC doesn't set the FE_INVALID flag on comparison with NAN (=, =, , ),
at least on amd64, e.g. with:
#include stdio.h
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.26~git20120612.ad5f375-6
Severity: normal
TCC doesn't set the FE_INVALID flag on comparison with NAN (=, =, , ),
at least on amd64, e.g. with:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
#include fenv.h
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
int main (void)
{
double d = NAN;
volatile
4 matches
Mail list logo
