On 2016-07-21 20:27:53, James Bromberger wrote:
> On 21/07/2016 3:58 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> >
> > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> lucas: it's not suitable for deb.d.o in its current
> > configuration.
> > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> as I said whenever somebody last asked about it.
> > 09:25 < lucas> is this d
On 21/07/2016 3:58 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> 09:25 <@Mithrandir> lucas: it's not suitable for deb.d.o in its current
> configuration.
> 09:25 <@Mithrandir> as I said whenever somebody last asked about it.
> 09:25 < lucas> is this documented somewhere? if it's not suitable for
> deb.debian.or
On 21/07/16 at 09:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit :
> >
> > do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have
> > CloudFront
> > CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS?
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
> I think tha
Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit :
>
> do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have
> CloudFront
> CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS?
Hi Marcin,
I think that http(s)://cloudfront.debian.net/ is exactly what we need.
And I a
Hi Charles,
do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have CloudFront
CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS?
I don't think we can gain much more speed wise and as to lowering transfer
costs for our users I don't think that it'll change much in this case either as
5 matches
Mail list logo