SOrry guys, I guess I have to say good-bye to ibus.
I removed all ibus components, installed fcitx, and now, out of nothing,
everything works. Per window setting, Japanese input in firefox/iceweasel,
...
I guess it is time for me to drop ibus.
Norbert
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
I would propose to re-upload 1.4 with a new epoch to unstable, to
unbreak current sitatuon.
I prefer Let IBus be IBus.
Debian is not a one-stop shop like some other distros.
I guess we don't have to hide something from
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752
Seen that, it is huge, not
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
Do you think uploading as something like 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2 will work?
Should work I guess, if you really want to avoid epochs.
Just try with
dpkg --compare-version 1.5.1-2 lt 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2-1
?
Norbert
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
Do you think uploading as something like 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2 will work?
Should work I guess, if you really want to avoid epochs.
Just try with
dpkg --compare-version 1.5.1-2 lt
Hi, all.
FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
(with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
For errors like ERROR:root:Could not find any typelib for IBus
Have you installed GI stuff properly?
Have you got gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Ma,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
(with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
- separate IME for different windows is working?
- did you try gnome3 (gnome-shell)?
Norbert
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi Ma,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
(with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
- separate IME for different windows is working?
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
- separate IME for different windows is working?
AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug.
Ok, maybe I was wrong with my explanation: What about the
*activation*status*
of the IME? Before I had the option to have some windows with
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Is this really gone? (BTW, even if they remove it, I would consider
it a bug that should be reintroduced upstream )
Yes.
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1568
But GNOME blog says such feature is
Hi Ma,
thanks for your email, good research, horrible reading
(GNome devs are *sick*, removing features without understanding
their imprtance)
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Is this really gone? (BTW, even if
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi Ma,
thanks for your email, good research, horrible reading
(GNome devs are *sick*, removing features without understanding
their imprtance)
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
The option has been hidden in ibus-setup, but I'm worry that whether
ibus 1.5 itself has removed the capability.
I believe that it is removed since changing dconf key has no effect either.
For IBus (1.4.99+) + GNOME combo,
Hi,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752
Seen that, it is huge, not sure reverting it would help.
There are too many code changes there. I have
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
I just saw in the
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 00:42:29 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
Thanks for the report, I was on train when I first saw the report,
I'll deal with it very soon.
Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
Cheers,
Julien
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
Breaking sid has no connection to freeze and release, if the maintainer
do not plan to ask for a freeze exception.
Don't go
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 04:01 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
Breaking sid has no connection to freeze and release, if the
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It might be an issue for the release if any of the reverse dependencies
need an update for some other reason, given that the new ibus upload
changes SONAME..,
Ok, conceeded. Indeed in this case upload to experimental would have been
better.
Norbert
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It might be an issue for the release if any of the reverse dependencies
need an update for some other reason, given that the new ibus upload
changes SONAME..,
Ok, conceeded.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
I really hoped that 1.5.1 would fix, not exacerbate or continue,
the situation.
I
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
I really
Dear all,
thanks for taking care for that.
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Osamu Aoki wrote:
This is somewhat expected complication which I am no expert to explain.
Aron,
What we need is a wiki.debian.org/ibus page which describes post-1.5
migration howto. I am sure you have already done some.
I
Thanks for the report, I was on train when I first saw the report,
I'll deal with it very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I am trying to run ibus from
Hi,
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Hi Aron,
thanks for your message.
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
No, I *have* gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed and it does not work.
It is
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
I just saw in the git repo:
ibus (1.5.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
_
27 matches
Mail list logo
