On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up?
It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here.
Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new upload as 5.11 would have been
rejected.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2013-03-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up?
It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here.
Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new upload as 5.11 would have been
rejected.
Such
On 18.03.2013 13:55, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2013-03-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up?
It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine
here.
Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up?
It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here.
A.
--
Modern man has a kind of poverty of the spirit which stands
in great contrast to his remarkable scientific and technological
achievements. We've learned to walk in
4 matches
Mail list logo