Bug#703274: why the epoch update on file?

2013-03-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up? It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here. Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new upload as 5.11 would have been rejected. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#703274: why the epoch update on file?

2013-03-18 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2013-03-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up? It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here. Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new upload as 5.11 would have been rejected. Such

Bug#703274: why the epoch update on file?

2013-03-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 18.03.2013 13:55, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2013-03-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 18.03.2013 03:57, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up? It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here. Unstable already had 5.12-2, so a new

Bug#703274: why the epoch update on file?

2013-03-17 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Why did this upload have to bump the epoch number up? It seems to me a 5.11-2.1, or -2.2 upload would have been fine here. A. -- Modern man has a kind of poverty of the spirit which stands in great contrast to his remarkable scientific and technological achievements. We've learned to walk in