Heya,
On 31/10/13 09:03, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 00:36 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
OK, I assumed it was gvfsd-gphoto2 as that's what #707681 was about.
Do you think this is unrelated and want me to open another bug report?
I think this is unrelated yes, but
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 00:36 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
OK, I assumed it was gvfsd-gphoto2 as that's what #707681 was about.
Do you think this is unrelated and want me to open another bug report?
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
As said in the subject, it happens also with gvfs 1.18.2-1 from
experimental.
Is someone actually looking at bug reports and can investigate if it's a
problem in gvfs, in libusb or elsewhere?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 30/10/13 09:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is someone actually looking at bug reports and can investigate if it's a
problem in gvfs, in libusb or elsewhere?
Get a gdb backtrace with debugging symbols (the one in the bug report is
useless), and ideally send it to bugzilla.gnome.org.
Emilio
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:16 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/10/13 09:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is someone actually looking at bug reports and can investigate if it's a
problem in gvfs, in libusb or elsewhere?
Get a gdb backtrace with debugging symbols (the one in the bug
On 30/10/13 15:48, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:16 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/10/13 09:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is someone actually looking at bug reports and can investigate if it's a
problem in gvfs, in libusb or elsewhere?
Get a gdb backtrace with
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 16:24 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/10/13 15:48, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:16 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/10/13 09:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is someone actually looking at bug reports and can investigate if it's a
Hey,
On 30/10/13 16:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
gvfsd-gphoto2 seems dbus activated so it's not really practical. And
rebuilding the whole stuff is pretty painful actually, which is why I
asked some help from the package maintainers…
I think it's /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor that
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 17:52 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hey,
On 30/10/13 16:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
gvfsd-gphoto2 seems dbus activated so it's not really practical. And
rebuilding the whole stuff is pretty painful actually, which is why I
asked some help from the package
On 30/10/13 18:51, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
What's crashing is gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor:
Oct 30 16:36:53 scapa kernel: [130854.725634] traps:
gvfs-gphoto2-vo[6060] general protection ip:7f57f404a0d0 sp:7fff70f17cb8
error:0 in libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0[7f57f4046000+16000]
Error creating
On 30/10/13 19:51, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 17:52 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hey,
On 30/10/13 16:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
gvfsd-gphoto2 seems dbus activated so it's not really practical. And
rebuilding the whole stuff is pretty painful actually, which is
11 matches
Mail list logo
