Bug#709991: False Original-maintainer warning

2013-05-27 Thread David Henningsson

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.10

Hi!

A lot of Ubuntu packages emit this warning on build:

dpkg-deb: warning: 'package/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined 
field  'Original-Maintainer'

dpkg-deb: warning: ignoring 1 warning about the control file(s)

In Ubuntu we encourage the use of XSBC-Original-Maintainer, thus we 
shouldn't warn about it. I thought this was Ubuntu specific, but was 
told that I should file a bug upstream for inclusion instead.


So I'm sending a patch to add Original-Maintainer as a known header 
field in debian/control.



--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#709991: False Original-maintainer warning

2013-05-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi!

On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 12:46:44 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
 Package: dpkg
 Version: 1.16.10

 A lot of Ubuntu packages emit this warning on build:
 
 dpkg-deb: warning: 'package/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined
 field  'Original-Maintainer'
 dpkg-deb: warning: ignoring 1 warning about the control file(s)
 
 In Ubuntu we encourage the use of XSBC-Original-Maintainer, thus we
 shouldn't warn about it. I thought this was Ubuntu specific, but was
 told that I should file a bug upstream for inclusion instead.
 
 So I'm sending a patch to add Original-Maintainer as a known
 header field in debian/control.

The reason I've never done this myself (the patch is trivial, and
ideally it would also cover the source packages), is because it does
not work when there's a derivative of a derivative, etc, so it's not
a generic solution. I'll ponder about this.

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org