Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org, 2014-01-27, 14:49: | *SKIP package has metadata but no tests | adt-run: tests done. | | === | Status: fail (Tests failed); duration: 0h 0m 3s |

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:38:24PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org, 2014-01-21, 21:23: | 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80] Oops. that could be a problem in ci.d.n, which is pretty new - currently half the autotests there fail, while the packages are not

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org, 2014-01-21, 21:23: | 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80] Oops. that could be a problem in ci.d.n, which is pretty new - currently half the autotests there fail, while the packages are not *that* broken :) cc:ing terceiro so he can comment on this.

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Jakub, instead of running the test suite at build time, how about adding autopkgtests and run the test suite on new uploads on ci.debian.net? I'd think that this would have the same effect :-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org, 2014-01-21, 16:23: instead of running the test suite at build time, how about adding autopkgtests adequate does have autopkgtests. :-) and run the test suite on new uploads on ci.debian.net? I didn't know about ci.d.n. Let me see… The latest log[0]

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org, 2014-01-21, 16:23: instead of running the test suite at build time, how about adding autopkgtests adequate does have autopkgtests. :-) heh - I'm not surprised at all actually :) and run the test

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org, 2014-01-21, 22:04: another random idea: the testsuite could download some (auto generated) chroot tarball and test adequate on that?! Downloading stuff at build time is a no-no. 2) When I filed the bug, there was no infrastructure to automatically run

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote: Downloading stuff at build time is a no-no. right... :) Blargh, I meant s/5/8/. ah. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#714031: use autopkgtests instead?

2014-01-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:04:11PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org, 2014-01-21, 16:23: instead of running the test suite at build time, how about adding autopkgtests adequate does have autopkgtests.