Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Schmidt ol...@web.de wrote:
The man pages could be generated with help2man, or they could point to
the GNU info files.
It seems that
linuxdoc -B txt --man ...
groff -man ...
might be another option.
Will check this once I get home.
On
Hi Oliver,
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt ol...@web.de wrote:
Iff everything else is settled regarding packaging (incl. licensing) I'll
reach out to the list members and ask for last-minute contribtions. If that
phase is over I'll add a tag to the Git repo.
OK, sounds good.
Hi Laszlo,
On the other hand, Oliver promised me to
add something like a consecutive number if I really need it for
packaging purposes.
I can confirm this.
Please do it then to confirm which commit should be considered a
stable release.
Iff everything else is settled regarding
On 05/05/2015 03:08 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Then the first step is to ask everyone you (we?) know to allow the
relicensing of the whole cc65. This means all contributors of the code
who ever changed something in it, even a single character. Do others
like John R. Dunning or
On 05/05/2015 02:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
I made a statement about _my_ contributions to cc65. I don't know who else
has contributed to cc65 before I started to maintain the upstream repo. In
fact I personally don't see how an exhaustive list of contributors can be
archived. And without
Hi Adrian,
Who if not Ullrich is authoritative to give such a statement regarding
the license of the code. He wrote - by far - the largest portions of the
code and supervised all contributions. I am pretty sure we can take his
word on that.
Full ACK !
Regards,
Oliver
Hi Laszlo,
$ git clone g...@github.com:cc65/cc65.git
$ cd cc65
$ git log --all --format='%aN %cE' | sort -u
This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
Ullrich with his/her patch.
I know for sure that this was in fact done. When Ullrich started with cc65
he
On 05/05/2015 03:52 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
Ullrich with his/her patch. As it was not commited by the contributor
but Ullrich, the person's identity is lost.
Well, then Ullrich didn't use the version control
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 05/05/2015 03:08 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Then the first step is to ask everyone you (we?) know to allow the
relicensing of the whole cc65. This means all contributors of the code
who
On 05/05/2015 08:42 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
Please note that Uz insisted on any contribution to cc65 to be licensed
under zlib license. Thus, the only parts and contributions that might
not fall under zlib are the parts that were there when Uz took over the
project.
Thus, it does not
On 05/05/2015 08:18 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Me too. ;)
Took a quick check with a browser into your packaging. It's old
style, but looks promising.
I'm looking forward to see the first package when it's done. If you
agree, I'd like to have a look at it as well before you go ahead
Hi Adrian,
@Oliver: Do you agree that we are 100% safe on the license now?
Yes.
If you agree, please cut down the LICENSE [1] file to the lines 42
through 58.
Done:
https://github.com/cc65/cc65/commit/aeb849257277a6b98542de8579697b81c6dd70e6
Regards,
Oliver
Hello,
* On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:54:19PM +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
Uhm, I think you are taking this way too serious. I don't think that
anyone who ever contributed to cc65 besides Ullrich and John would not
agree to have the code
Hi Spiro,
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis
ml-cc65-git...@spiro.trikaliotis.net wrote:
* On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:11PM +0200 László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
To be honest, I've already packaged it.
Me too. ;)
Took a quick check with a browser into your packaging. It's
Hello Adrian,
* On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 05/05/2015 03:52 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to
Ullrich with his/her patch. As it was not commited by the contributor
but
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:06 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 05/05/2015 08:18 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Yup, I consider you a friend of mine. We can work together on this
package and you or others may check my version[1] until the license
issue is
Hi,
The man pages could be generated with help2man, or they could point to
the GNU info files.
It seems that
linuxdoc -B txt --man ...
groff -man ...
might be another option. As far as I remember Ullrich did that in former
times. If someone tests it I'd be willing to add it to
Hi all related people,
To be honest, I've already packaged it. I've two problems above the
license issue. None of the tools have neither a manpage nor a HTML
documentation. Then there's no tag or any version number in the GitHub
repository.
Anyway, I'd like to have it in Debian as I already have
Hello László,
* On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:11PM +0200 László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
To be honest, I've already packaged it.
Me too. ;)
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:strik/cc65
I know, it does not hold to Debian's standards, but this is something I
could work on if the
19 matches
Mail list logo
