Hi,
intrigeri wrote (22 Jan 2014 10:35:56 GMT) :
Daniel Pocock wrote (21 Jan 2014 17:55:15 GMT) :
On 21/01/14 18:43, intrigeri wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) :
I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files.
Yes, please.
AFAICT, this stable
Hi,
Daniel Pocock wrote (21 Jan 2014 17:55:15 GMT) :
On 21/01/14 18:43, intrigeri wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) :
I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files.
Yes, please.
AFAICT, this stable proposed update has been blocking on the lack of
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) :
I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files.
Yes, please.
AFAICT, this stable proposed update has been blocking on the lack of
a filtered diff for almost 4 months. Daniel, do you still intend to
follow-up on this?
On 21/01/14 18:43, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) :
I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files.
Yes, please.
AFAICT, this stable proposed update has been blocking on the lack of
a filtered diff for almost 4 months. Daniel,
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:55:08PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
A lot of that is because the autotools artifacts (e.g. Makefile.in) are
quite big and have been regenerated on each release
Other things can also be ignored, for example, there are lots of XML
files
On 21/07/13 20:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 20:26 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Nope. Bugs in packages may have all kinds of severities, requests to
update packages in stable are normal at best. (It would also be
helpful if
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 20:26 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Nope. Bugs in packages may have all kinds of severities, requests to
update packages in stable are normal at best. (It would also be
helpful if you used reportbug or otherwise normalised the
7 matches
Mail list logo
