On 11.10.2014 22:44, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
Markus Koschany was kind enough to work on a patch, would you mind
looking at it and possibly apply it?
Hi,
I have rebased the patch against the latest version of Transmission in unstable.
I agree with Andrei that this bug is not entirely
Control: reopen -1
Control: merge -1 754927
Hi Thomas,
Thanks a lot for looking into fixing bugs in transmission-daemon.
Unfortunately I have to reopen this bug (again) because the fix is...
incomplete:
1. Type in the .service file should be 'notify' (upstream .service file
is correct)
2.
On 08/04/2014 13:09, Markus Koschany wrote:
Updated patch is attached.
It works for me and fixed the problem. Even if my configuration is a modified
settings.json with not
the default download directory.
--
François Bobot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Lu, 07 apr 14, 20:03:51, Markus Koschany wrote:
Here is the changelog:
...
* transmission-daemon.postrm:
- Also delete debian-transmission user when purging the daemon.
Didn't get the chance to test your patch, but this caught my eye. As far
as I recall the consensus was that
On 08.04.2014 10:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 07 apr 14, 20:03:51, Markus Koschany wrote:
Here is the changelog:
...
* transmission-daemon.postrm:
- Also delete debian-transmission user when purging the daemon.
Didn't get the chance to test your patch, but this caught my eye. As
On Sb, 05 apr 14, 21:26:39, Markus Koschany wrote:
thanks for testing. I will try to write a patch which implements these
changes.
Writing the patch is probably not the difficult part but rather to ensure
that the upgrade path works and the changes won't cause any breakage.
I won't find
retitle 718624 transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd due to erroneous
maintainer scripts
tags 718624 patch
thanks
On 07.04.2014 12:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
If you build a package with your patch applied I'll try to do some
testing.
Hello Andrei and Antoine,
thanks for
On 04.04.2014 19:57, Antoine wrote:
On 04/03/2014 07:27 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
and try out different settings. It would be great if you confirmed that
the solutions mentioned in #718624 worked for you.
Actually I didn't have to change anything at all in the service file
after I've
On 04/03/2014 07:27 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 03.04.2014 18:20, Antoine wrote:
[...]
In that case, I think bug #718624 gravity should be set to grave, as it
breaks the installation of the package through DPKG.
I agree that this is a release critical issue thus the severity should
be
Control: tags 742626 - moreinfo
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: merge 718624 742626
On 03.04.2014 18:20, Antoine wrote:
[...]
In that case, I think bug #718624 gravity should be set to grave, as it
breaks the installation of the package through DPKG.
I agree that this is a release
10 matches
Mail list logo
